Is capactive really BETTER than resistive?

Most of the latest smartphones and upcoming phones appear to have capacative screens and they seem to be the preferred type. However, I still use a resistive screen and I recently borrowed an HTC HD2 with capactive screen and I was not that impressed.

Certainly, they do resopond to a lighter touch but for me that was an irritation as I would regularly accidentally touch/select something by mistake. My Touch Pro2 resistive screen does not require much more pressure on the screen but just enough that it is hard to select something accidentally. I also like to use my finger nail to select which of course you cannot do with a capactive screen. Selecting some of the smaller menus in Windows Mobile is quite difficult on a capactive screen.

The other reason I like using my finger nail is to minimize finger marks on the screen. I noticed when using a capactive screen that it was covered in finger marks very quickly.

So, are capactive screens really "better"? I have held off upgrading my Touch Pro2 as I do not think that capactive screens are better than some of the latter resistive screens. However, it seems that if I do want to upgrade my phone in due course I am going to have to go with a capactive screen.

Maybe my Touch Pro2 will serve me for a while longer yet!

Show Accepted Answer

Guest Quick Reply (No URL, BBcode or HTML)

Last post by mallie39
3 hours ago
Last post by claire.cronin
56 minutes ago
Last post by dedric71
1 hour ago
Last post by emie69
4 hours ago
Last post by rschumm
17 minutes ago
Last post by rgreenfelder
3 hours ago
Last post by marcus13
23 minutes ago